|
babyboy51505 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Well, I see the prof1988 continues to align himself with a theory which merely parallels and plagiarizes many of the conclusions creationists and intelligent designers knew long ago. Sad that some people still think in terms of luck, and randomness, oh, and magic. Somehow all of this just developed all by its little old self, like magic. One day there was no thought, and then there was. It is seriously flawed thinking based on pride or ego. Nevertheless, creationism and design is irrefutable.lol
HISTRUTHBEKNOWN (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
wildreams "...Charles Darwin suggest that the original spark of life may have begun in a "warm little pond, ...This is one of the earliest theory of Abiogenesis. So far, there are many models of Abiogenesis proposing how life could have first arise on Earth."
Darwinism/EVIL-ution is full of just so stories about many things each without empirical evidence/science.I CARE NOT for a plethora of "COULD BE STORIES".Could be is not truth therefore not science.Stop telling stories. Try real science.
HISTRUTHBEKNOWN (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
wildreams "In 1861 Louis Pasteur performed .. experiments which proved that organisms such as bacteria and fungi do not appear of their own accord in sterile nutrient-rich media, and which supported cell theory"
How does his work disproving Spontaneous Generation support cell theory? His work produced the Law known as the Law of Biogenesis which says basically that Life comes from Life, a Parent. Life is not materialistic, its about information which requires an intelligent being not material
HISTRUTHBEKNOWN (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
wildreams: Spontaneous Generation was needed to give Darwinism/Evilution credibility. Many false examples were offered by evil lying atheists to substantiate SG. Louis Pasteur, a brilliant scientist of his day God fearing man using his Biblical knowledge, disproved the superstitious notion of SG. Still there were evil lying atheist that opposed him still tried to find evidence. Thomas Huxley, comes to the rescue with abiogenesis, a proposal without evidence that happened in the past, a LIE
HISTRUTHBEKNOWN (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
magfly1 "There's nothing wrong with atheism. It's the only "religion" that makes any sense. Virtually all scientists accept evolution - with the exception of a few crazies. It's science and it's true. Live with it."
You are sorely mistaken misinformed. There is a priori that says only scientific-naturalism is an acceptable method. So-called scientists are demanded to adhere to it or else. They are all trying trying to find a solution which will not come since Darwinism/evolution is a lie.
HISTRUTHBEKNOWN (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
HTBK "The miller-Urey experiment was a failure...therefore abiogenesis is impossible"
TheEvilLyingProf1988 "Does anyone smell a logical fallacy brewing? Ignorance is not a form of proof, not knowing something is not a way of knowing something."
The empirical evidence says that Humans have not made a self-replicating organism with the collective intelligence of many world wide. Therefore, the brainless purposeless mythical magical materialistic naturalism cannot make life. It's not falsifiable!
HISTRUTHBEKNOWN (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
wildreams still talking out of your arse I see "None of these Abiogenesis models have anything to do with Evolution Theory which is about how living things evolve over time to better adapt to the environment."
Darwinism is the silly notion that claims to explain how the ridiculous fairy tale of EVIL-ution works. He claimed all life had a common ancestor in life that came to be in warm pools of water (pond scum). This supposed organism transmuted into everything that ever lived. This is a MYTH
TheProf1988 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
hmmmmm. HTBK where do you get your logic from?
The miller-Urey experiment was a failure...therefore abiogenesis is impossible.
Does anyone smell a logical fallacy brewing?
Ignorance is not a form of proof, not knowing something is not a way of knowing something.
HISTRUTHBEKNOWN (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
wildreams "..famous ..: MillerUrey experiment was done in 1952 was a very simple experiment that showed how Abiogenesis could be possible."
Science/truth is not about could be! The Miller-Urey experiment was not naturalistic; it did not use brainless purposeless materialistic naturalism; it was a complete failure. He spent the next 40 years without producing a simple self-replicating cell. There have been many other fairy tales proposed each of which are FAILURES. Abiogenesis is impossible.
HISTRUTHBEKNOWN (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
The Miller-Urey experiment was a failure. It was not naturalistic; it used human intelligence interference. Natural forces of cosmic solar UV would not sustain a reducing atmosphere since methane ammonia quickly photolyse. The geologic evidence does not support a reducing atmosphere; it supports an oxygen rich atmosphere since Aerobic plant fossils are found in the Archean PreCambrian rock. The SLoT chemical equilibrium Chirality issue would negate the formation of amino acids. FAILURE |
